Talk:Standard Packets: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 16 November 2014 by Refractor in topic moving eponymous page contents into the category
imported>Lisured |
imported>Refractor |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
should we do this? would condense navigation and it is a bit redundant --'''[[User:Refractor|<span style="color:#263852;padding:1px">refractor</span>]]''' 14:11, 16 November 2014 (UTC) | should we do this? would condense navigation and it is a bit redundant --'''[[User:Refractor|<span style="color:#263852;padding:1px">refractor</span>]]''' 14:11, 16 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
: Maybe we should remove it completely when the pages are created. Probably the best would be if the pages were generated grammatically ([https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Scribunto Lua]). --[[User:Lisured|Lisured]] ([[User talk:Lisured|talk]]) 18:30, 16 November 2014 (UTC) | : Maybe we should remove it completely when the pages are created. Probably the best would be if the pages were generated grammatically ([https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Scribunto Lua]). --[[User:Lisured|Lisured]] ([[User talk:Lisured|talk]]) 18:30, 16 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
:: Yeah, the pages like this that have categories named after them could be deleted. Generating it programmatically would be a bit hairy, but the possibility of Semantic MediaWiki could make it easy. --[[User:Refractor|Refractor]] ([[User talk:Refractor|talk]]) 21:49, 16 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:49, 16 November 2014
Consider naming the packets by what the client calls them.
Packet categories need implementing, there are more than just %xt%s% packets (z, r, etc).
Categorization
The "requests" table from this page will soon be removed. I'd like for every category to have its own table like this one.. example.
moving eponymous page contents into the category
should we do this? would condense navigation and it is a bit redundant --refractor 14:11, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
- Maybe we should remove it completely when the pages are created. Probably the best would be if the pages were generated grammatically (Lua). --Lisured (talk) 18:30, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, the pages like this that have categories named after them could be deleted. Generating it programmatically would be a bit hairy, but the possibility of Semantic MediaWiki could make it easy. --Refractor (talk) 21:49, 16 November 2014 (UTC)